Comments on: WorldView: Bhutto, Canada and Afghanistan http://jnarvey.com/2007/12/27/bhutto-canada-and-afghanistan/ A Vancouver writer blogs about current affairs, politics, social media and life on Canada's west coast Sat, 11 Oct 2008 18:39:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: jnarvey http://jnarvey.com/2007/12/27/bhutto-canada-and-afghanistan/#comment-350 jnarvey Sat, 29 Dec 2007 00:28:34 +0000 http://jnarvey.com/?p=235#comment-350 Obtuse (definition): # [adj] slow to learn or understand; lacking intellectual acuity; "so dense he never understands anything I say to him"; "never met anyone quite so dim"; "although dull at classical learning, at mathematics he was uncommonly quick"- Thackeray; "dumb officials make some really dumb decisions"; "he was either normally stupid or being deliberately obtuse"; "worked with the slow students" # [adj] lacking in insight or discernment; "too obtuse to grasp the implications of his behavior"; "a purblind oligarchy that flatly refused to see that history was condemning it to the dustbin"- Jasper Griffin Synonyms: dense, dim, dull, dumb, purblind, simple, slow, stupid, undiscerning, unsubdivided Obtuse (definition):
# [adj] slow to learn or understand; lacking intellectual acuity; “so dense he never understands anything I say to him”; “never met anyone quite so dim”; “although dull at classical learning, at mathematics he was uncommonly quick”- Thackeray; “dumb officials make some really dumb decisions”; “he was either normally stupid or being deliberately obtuse”; “worked with the slow students”

# [adj] lacking in insight or discernment; “too obtuse to grasp the implications of his behavior”; “a purblind oligarchy that flatly refused to see that history was condemning it to the dustbin”- Jasper Griffin

Synonyms: dense, dim, dull, dumb, purblind, simple, slow, stupid, undiscerning, unsubdivided

]]> By: Madelaine http://jnarvey.com/2007/12/27/bhutto-canada-and-afghanistan/#comment-349 Madelaine Fri, 28 Dec 2007 09:39:24 +0000 http://jnarvey.com/?p=235#comment-349 Good answer. Really thought that one out. Hope you have the cojones to leave it where everybody can see it - tough guy. Maybe being part of the same gene pool as you is what got your uncle killed. ... just ... not... smart ... enough... to ... keep ... breathing... LOL. I've had my fun with you now. You can go. Good answer.
Really thought that one out.
Hope you have the cojones to leave it where everybody can see it - tough guy.

Maybe being part of the same gene pool as you is what got your uncle killed.
… just … not… smart … enough… to … keep … breathing…
LOL.

I’ve had my fun with you now.
You can go.

]]> By: jnarvey http://jnarvey.com/2007/12/27/bhutto-canada-and-afghanistan/#comment-346 jnarvey Fri, 28 Dec 2007 01:21:00 +0000 http://jnarvey.com/?p=235#comment-346 I'll be sure to take your lunch money and give you a wedgie at the first opportunity. Thanks for taking the time. I’ll be sure to take your lunch money and give you a wedgie at the first opportunity. Thanks for taking the time.

]]> By: Madelaine http://jnarvey.com/2007/12/27/bhutto-canada-and-afghanistan/#comment-345 Madelaine Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:55:29 +0000 http://jnarvey.com/?p=235#comment-345 We need to get our military into Pakistan. Right? I mean - if the terrorists are killing women in Pakistan we've obviously only pushed them into a different region - instead of eliminating them. Apparently, if we're using your "logical/touchy-feely" system, you'd agree that killing women and political candidates means that we should now head into Pakistan too. Musharraf is obviously harbouring terrorists in his country and definitely is a human rights abuser - just like the Taliban. So why don't you write a letter demanding we send troops into Pakistan? Oh yeh - that's right - they have nuclear weapons and aren't quite the 3rd worlders that our little buddies in Afghanistan are... It's a conflagration you're not really "comfortable" with. Like a schoolyard bully... picking your fights. Less than 24 hours ago - before this happened - I asked you on this blog if you had any clue as to the history between your much beloved Aghanistan and Pakistan. Maybe this will 'learn you. Thanks for doing your part in ensuring terrorism remains a growth industry in Pakistan. Good job! PS: Anybody who takes a politician words at face value is an idiot or a rube. I bet you crapped your diapers when Condeleeza said, "We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud"... right? We need to get our military into Pakistan.

Right?
I mean - if the terrorists are killing women in Pakistan we’ve obviously only pushed them into a different region - instead of eliminating them. Apparently, if we’re using your “logical/touchy-feely” system, you’d agree that killing women and political candidates means that we should now head into Pakistan too. Musharraf is obviously harbouring terrorists in his country and definitely is a human rights abuser - just like the Taliban.

So why don’t you write a letter demanding we send troops into Pakistan?

Oh yeh - that’s right - they have nuclear weapons and aren’t quite the 3rd worlders that our little buddies in Afghanistan are… It’s a conflagration you’re not really “comfortable” with. Like a schoolyard bully… picking your fights.

Less than 24 hours ago - before this happened - I asked you on this blog if you had any clue as to the history between your much beloved Aghanistan and Pakistan. Maybe this will ‘learn you.

Thanks for doing your part in ensuring terrorism remains a growth industry in Pakistan. Good job!

PS: Anybody who takes a politician words at face value is an idiot or a rube. I bet you crapped your diapers when Condeleeza said, “We don’t want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud”… right?

]]>