New Media

For the record, I’m not a fan of Ann Coulter. My contempt is not based primarily on her politics — I just think she’s an idiot, for saying stuff like this: “We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity.”

Context is everything. Ann seems to get off on a big technicality here in that there is no global Christian movement to subvert nations around the world in order to unite a Christian empire that aims to put all subjects under “Christian” law — whatever that would be. The Crusades have been over for centuries and there simply is no modern example of Christian nations going to war to spread their faith by the sword — mostly because outside of the Vatican, there are no countries left that one could identify as Christian. As such, Coulter’s words are pretty much meaningless.

As offensive as she is, she ought to be ignored as anyone would be if they said, “We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Zoroastrianism.” Or Keynesianism. Or collective-agrarianism.

Of course, if you had a speaker at a Canadian university that substituted “Islam” for “Christianity” in that quote, heads would have to roll in the university establishment. There undoubtedly is an active global jihadist movement that is killing people (mostly Muslims) every day. In this case, the quote has contextual meaning. But Coulter’s? Her jibber-jabber quotes are made solely for the purpose of boosting book and ticket sales by pubescent-minded Rush Limbaugh fans.

That said, I’m deeply embarrassed for my country thanks to this sad tale of Soviet-style shenanigans emanating from the University of Ottawa:

“Dear Ms. Coulter,

François Houle.”
‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑
Vice-recteur aux études / Vice-President Academic and Provost
Université d’Ottawa / University of Ottawa
550, rue Cumberland Street
Ottawa (ON) K1N 6N5
téléphone / telephone : 613 562-5737
télécopieur / fax : 613 562-5103
www.uOttawa.ca/vr-etudes-academic

H/T to Blazing Cat Fur

UPDATE: How embarrassing is it for us that we seem to require an American right-wing nutcase to defend Canadian freedom of speech? Good luck with the CHRC complaint, Coulter.

UPPERDATE: The humiliation just doesn’t stop. Canadian thugs stop angry Ann from speaking. Freedom of speech in the True North takes a hit along with our international reputation. Even Warren Kinsella’s embarrassed.

I wandered among the costumed weirdos and black-masked anarchists at the protest. This was the big anti-Olympics event in Vancouver on the opening day of the Games. I soon came to the conclusion that the Olympics and our city’s politicians have nothing to worry about for the duration of the games and probably for some time to come.

Ask a protester what they were rebelling against that day and you’d almost have to expect Marlon Brando’s answer from the Wild One: “What have you got?” This wasn’t a protest against the Olympics. It was a protest against “the system.” But disaffected oddballs and shadowy loners does not a revolution make.

Accompanied by my friend and fellow National Post contributor Adrian MacNair, I first met a pleasant comrade from the Young Communist League who seemed positively cheerful about the new members his group had signed up. His organization was present to make the point that government ought to be spending more on the housing, students and day care rather than Olympics. Those are actually policies that I’d be happy to get on board with. Still, you don’t have to be a follower of an ideology legitimizing mass murder and gulags to get that done. He seemed awfully polite. I assume he’ll go mainstream at some point an inevitably join up with the NDP.

Then I met the man disguised by a mask imprinted with the words “free speech area”. When I asked him what he actually had to say about the Olympics — or anything, for that matter — he clammed up. Evidently, free speech is a right best reserved for times other than when pretty much everyone in the world wants to know what you have to say.

I met a young Cree woman who carried a sign that claimed “Canada is Illegal”. Her group, “No One is Illegal”, evidently believes that the Olympics organizers ought to have gotten the written consent of every living First Nations person in the country before proceeding with the event. The enthusiastic support of the Four Host First Nations that have actually resided here since before the arrival of the first Europeans evidently wasn’t good enough.

Next up was the lady in town from Sochi to protest having the next Olympics in a region steeped in the memory of the 100-year old genocide of 1.5 million Circassians by Czarist Russia. She seemed earnest enough. But I honestly don’t know if Russians, much less Canadians, will even see a real connection between this historical tragedy and the 2014 Winter Olympics. Besides, if the Russians can’t do anything official on a part of their territory that hasn’t already been steeped in blood or mired in historical injustice, well, the world’s biggest country is going to have an awful time finding anywhere they can hold any sort of international event.

Then there was the group shouting “Shut down the tar sands!” Protest signs indicated that the Olympics were somehow responsible for mass-murder as a result of our odd habit of digging up stuff out of our ground that people all over the world seem to need to run their factories and heat their homes. I have to confess, I never bothered to talk to anyone about this. I’d already gone down enough rabbit holes.

The point is that the protesters against the Olympics are guided by a hundred different agendas. None of them really has much to do with the Olympics. That’s why the event only pulled in a few hundred angry souls, surrounded by a larger number of curious spectators who were not necessarily in sympathy with any of their goals.

The time to disrupt the games was clearly on the first day. But the lunatic fringe seems only to have alienated a wider base by their odd rhetoric. They didn’t pull the numbers and by the time the Olympics opening ceremonies were set to begin, most of the protesters who came out were already sullenly on their way home to plot and plan… and probably do nothing else for the next few weeks. The reinforced lines of police, some on horseback, that came to greet the rally were not pressured as at the “Battle of Seattle” or similar venues. It seems that the Games can safely ignore the divided and not particularly successful protests from here on in.

I decided to find out for myself what these protests were all about

Not so much. 2010 is already looking a lot like the rest of the last decade since 9/11. The latest incident:

Danish police have shot and wounded a man at the home of Kurt Westergaard, whose cartoon depicting the Prophet Muhammad sparked an international row.

Mr Westergaard was at home in Aarhus when a man broke in and threatened him. He pressed a panic button and police entered the house and shot the man.

Danish officials said the intruder was a 28-year-old Somali linked to the radical Islamist al-Shabab militia.

Clearly, the strategy of laying low and spending millions of dollars to provide security for those under threat by fanatics isn’t working. Instead, how about locking up those local citizens threatening to carry out such attacks, or who condone such violence? And as a rule, cutting off diplomatic relations with nations that officially issue these sorts of extrajudicial death sentences?

Putting the victim of the threat under what amounts to house arrest indefinitely has obviously done little to actually make them more secure or deter these maniacs. It didn’t work with Salman Rushdie. It doesn’t work today, either. Our freedoms deserve a far more robust defense than has so far been on offer.

Muhammed cartoon artist Kurt Westergaard interview

Further Reading
The Attack On Kurt Westergaard
The Noble Quest to Silence Kurt Westergaard
The Qu’ran Apparently Demands Incompetence

Reporters Without Borders reports that Canada’s freedom of speech has measurably suffered, apparently due in part to the Canadian Human Rights Commission’s censorious activities (Details at Ezra Levant’s blog). Chris Waddell, a journalism professor at Carleton University, criticizes the institution in the CP thusly:

Waddell says the second thing that comes to mind is the Canadian Human Rights Commission, which has come under fire recently over a couple of high-profile cases.

One of those cases involved a Mark Steyn book excerpt on the Maclean’s magazine web site. The excerpt was accused of promoting hatred and contempt of Muslims.

That case was tossed out, but led some to demand that the commission be disbanded.

Mind you, we’re still ahead of the Yanks. Apparently, the Danes are today’s beacon of freedom in the world.

Getting back to the point, though, isn’t it long past time to disband the CHRC?

Rex Murphy’s Take on the CHRC