New Media » Taliban

So Much for the Olympic Truce

jnarvey — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:09:33 +0000

If we remain true to our tradition as Canadians and responsible members of the international community, we’re going to help finish the fight in Afghanistan — notwithstanding those commentators who seem to think that we ought to put down our weapons at the behest of the IOC or VANOC at the same time that Taliban snipers are shooting at ISAF soldiers from behind human shields.

The scary thing is that I can’t detect the slightest trace of satire in the Georgia Straight’s latest hit-and-run propaganda attack on Canada’s mission in Afghanistan. I think editor Charlie Smith might actually be serious:

I think it’s time for the IOC to include some penalties for those who violate the truce, including NATO leaders.

If Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Chief of the Defence Staff Walt Natynczyk, and U.S. vice president Joe Biden were refused entry into Vancouver Olympic venues for being warmongers during a truce period, perhaps this world would suddenly get a little more peaceful.

Smith seems to suggest that UN Secretary Ban Ki Moon actually wants Canadians to throw down their weapons and bug out of Afghanistan ASAP.

That’s a distortion of the truth. The UN bigwig couldn’t have been more clear about the importance of Canada’s boots on the ground. Remember this?

Once again, the opportunists are on the rise, seeking anew to make Afghanistan a lawless place — a locus of instability, terrorism and drug trafficking. Their means are desperate: suicide bombs, kidnappings, the killing of government officials and hijacking of aid convoys. Almost more dismaying is the response of some outside Afghanistan, who react by calling for a disengagement or the full withdrawal of international forces. This would be a misjudgment of historic proportions, the repetition of a mistake that has already had terrible consequences…

The United Nations, alongside national and international counterparts, non-governmental organizations and Afghan civil society, will continue to provide the Afghan government whatever assistance it needs to build on these achievements. Our collective success depends on the continuing presence of the International Security Assistance Force [emphasis added], commanded by NATO and helping local governments in nearly every province to maintain security and carry out reconstruction projects.

In any case, there can be no truce with these fanatics. Their idea of a ceasefire is an off-season to recruit child suicide bombers and make some point about the unifying spirit of religion by spraying acid in the faces of girls who want to learn to read.

Let’s be clear. The UN wants us in Afghanistan. Our NATO allies want us in Afghanistan. The long-suffering Afghan people want us in their country. The only true warmongers are those who would have us abandon the field to let the Taliban conquer an entire nation.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Killing Terrorists. It’s All About Location, Location, Location

jnarvey — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:40:54 +0000

Just so we’re all on the same page, killing dangerous jihad-obsessed fanatics hunkered down along the Pakistan frontier with drone-fired Hellfire missiles is good.

The US has recently stepped up its drone attacks as the CIA hunts a bomber who killed seven CIA employees late last year in the border area.

In contrast, there seems to be a problem with killing a dangerous jihad-obsessed fanatic enjoying a stay at a Dubai luxury hotel.

Britain’s relations with Israel are entering a period of crisis over the apparent use of cloned UK passports in the assassination of a Hamas official in Dubai.

OK, got it. Keep the game in bounds, gentlemen. After all, what distinguishes us is that we play by the rules — as opposed to the enemy, who uses children as human shields.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

The Front Moves Forward by Inches

jnarvey — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:36:19 +0000

In contrast to the “All-Detainees, All the Time” coverage in Canada’s mainstream media, here’s some good news from the front, via the Torch:

The Afghan army assumed more responsibility for security in Kandahar City and surrounding villages, where Canadian troops train and mentor Afghan soldiers.

Seven more schools were built under Canada’s supervision, bringing the total number completed to 12, with another 21 under construction.

More than 880,000 children were vaccinated against polio [in September alone, in Kandahar and two other provinces].

More than 500 Afghans in key districts of Kandahar had received microfinance loans [in the quarter covered], already exceeding the program target.

Good news.

Recommended Reading
Notes on a Non-Scandal

Blatch Sums Up The Scandal that Isn’t

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Combating Withdrawal Symptoms

jnarvey — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:43:37 +0000

If 30 nations pull everything out and Afghanistan reverts to Taliban-land hosting the Al Queda hotel, how is that good for Afghans?

The “troops out now” propaganda machine that is Malalai Joya refused to answer my more polite version of this question a few years back when I talked to her on the steps of the Vancouver Art Gallery. I’m guessing she won’t drop by my blog to leave an answer in the comments, but you never know. She certainly isn’t trying to answer that question on her little book tour. Ah, well.

From my article in the Mark:

Afghan politician Malalai Joya is the darling of the left’s “Troops-Out-Now” movement. She was a member of Afghanistan’s parliament until she (truthfully enough) condemned her fellow politicians for being warlords and gangsters. These days she’s on a book tour to promote her ideas on how Afghanistan can emerge from the carnage of the last eight years. Her solution? Total withdrawal of international support for Afghanistan.

This certainly makes the isolationist and anti-American crowds happy. But it’s clear, from what Canadian human rights professional Lauryn Oates is hearing, that most Afghan women are disgusted by Joya’s views and afraid of what could happen if the international community pulled out.

Again and again, when confronted with the question of precisely how Afghans would benefit from a withdrawal, Joya retreats into xenophobic rhetoric that seems to imply that Afghans would rather have an oppressor of their own choosing than receive aid – and the security that makes that aid possible – from the UN-mandated mission.

Indeed, Joya’s arguments are virtually indistinguishable from Taliban head honcho Mullah Omar. Take this quote from a recent story in The National Post, “Saturday interview: Afghan activist Malalai Joya”:

Your government lies that they brought democracy and women’s rights to Afghanistan.

Just so we’re clear, this is from the woman who lived firsthand through the first stirrings of that democracy and participated directly in it. Indeed, the same article notes that “when the Taliban were toppled, she cast off her burka, took on the religious fundamentalists, and ran for parliament”.

At the risk of beating a dead horse, the point is that she won her political rights after the Taliban were toppled. Joya’s prescription for Afghanistan’s ills will almost surely end up in a rollback of those rights for women that Joya was able to use to her own advantage.

It gets worse. Another of Joya’s rants against the West:

We gave a good lesson to the Russians in the past – a superpower country who faced the resistance of my people. We gave good lessons to the British and we will give good lessons to the U.S. and Canada and NATO, if they do not stop this so-called war on terror, which is war on innocent civilians.

If this sounds familiar, it’s because we’ve heard it before, from Taliban chief Mullah Omar:

If you insist on occupying our land, you too will be defeated under the strikes of the Afghans around the world, just like the former Soviet Union.

Joya’s rhetoric is indistinguishable from the Taliban’s own propaganda talking points in too many ways. We know that as hard as life is for Afghan women at present, it was much worse when the Taliban was in charge. The question then is not just why Joya is saying these things when she must know in her heart that an international withdrawal will lead to a resumption of the Taliban’s misogynist brutality. The real question is why some in the West, where freedom and human rights for both genders are well established, are so eager to listen to this quisling.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

The Best Way to Taliban-Proof Afghanistan. Stay Involved

jnarvey — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:31:30 +0000

Canada-Afghanistan Solidarity Committee co-founder and professional human rights advocate Lauryn Oates issues a call to action for the international mission in Afghanistan: stay involved and help provide education to the new generation — and by the way, make sure the security is there so that the fanatics don’t wreck the these efforts in the meantime:

I think it’s imperative that an international security force remain on the ground in Afghanistan for at least a decade to come, and that should include representation from Canada. This is part of the solution in that it will provide much needed breathing space to build the foundations of a long-term solution: the establishment of effective, quality education, health care, good governance, legal reform, poverty alleviation, and space for the growth of civil society. But the Canadian government, and other donor governments who want to see a stable, peaceful Afghanistan must begin to explicitly make the link between long-term security and quality education; and they must be in it for the long haul.

Education is the most important place donor governments can put their money. But it will take years, if not decades, of commitment and there must be clear measures of accountability for results. It’s not enough that schools are open and pupils – girls and boys – are in their seats. More must be done, and soon. By investing in a quality education system in Afghanistan, Canada will help prevent future wars; and by maintaining a military presence on the ground now and beyond 2011, they can help stop this one.

This of course is in stark contrast to the strategy that appears to be favored by Afghan parliamentarian Malalai Joya, the darling of the largely leftist “troops-out-now” movement. Joya has still failed to explain how an international pullout followed by a civil war and eventual Taliban victory would be good for Afghan women.

Indeed, it is clear that all Afghan women with access to email list-servers and other means of communication are virtually unanimous in their opposition to Joya’s treacherous demagoguery. That’s because they know what a Taliban victory means in Afghanistan.

Malalai Joya, how will this help Afghan women?

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Blame the USA

jnarvey — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:49:35 +0000

Pakistani militant fanatics murder over 100 Pakistani civilians. Time to steamroll the Taliban once and for all and put an end to their reign of terror?

Nah. Just blame the Yanks.

Because that will fix everything.

I’m guessing they won’t be giving the money back.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Let Slip the Dogs of War

jnarvey — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:14:41 +0000

The Taliban could be finished in 2010. Things are looking up for Pakistan and the UN-mandated mission in Afghanistan.

The strategic error the Pakistani Taliban have made is game-changing. The Taliban attack on Pakistan’s army HQ means Pakistan now has no choice but to smash the fanatical thugs in what will likely be an extremely bloody operation.

Pakistan’s generals would have been happy to play a double game for years, propping up the Taliban in Afghanistan while making a show of sporadic and ineffective combat against the Taliban on their home turf, in return for billions in unconditional US military aid. No longer.

For eight years, Americans have been trying to bribe and cajole the Pakistani army to finally go into South Waziristan and do what the army of a rational state is supposed to do — enforce sovereignty right up to it’s national border. In the end, all of the logical prodding and cash-filled briefcases they’ve given their “ally” were for nothing. Many critics of the Pakistanis assumed the only thing that could get them to really take on the Taliban would be a direct attack on their masters — and now the thugs have obliged.

Some will argue that the Pakistanis simply don’t have enough military power to pacify the region where the Taliban rules. But now even Pakistan’s most recalcitrant generals should be willing to move a million troops from the Indian border into this fight. That’s a start.

Perhaps the newly emboldened Pakistani army will even be able to capture Osama in the Taliban’s home turf. You never know what they might find, now that they’ve got the stomach to do what they should have been doing for the past eight years.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.