<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Currents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jnarvey.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jnarvey.com</link>
	<description>A writer in Vancouver takes on current affairs, politics and life on Canada's west coast</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 04:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on EcoView: The Yellow Pages Must Be Stopped! by jnarvey</title>
		<link>http://jnarvey.com/2008/05/11/ecoview-the-yellow-pages-must-be-stopped/#comment-1048</link>
		<dc:creator>jnarvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 18:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jnarvey.com/?p=336#comment-1048</guid>
		<description>Hey Ken. Thanks again for correcting my lackluster research earlier. I'm very happy to hear that the Yellow Pages ARE NOT harming our old growth forests. 

Nonetheless, I'm afraid your latest points just haven't convinced me. Is is really impossible to find that recycling information you mentioned online?

Yes, the Yellow Pages and White Pages do have value for those Canadians still without Internet service either at home or at libraries, offices, or wifi cafes (wherever they are). But overall, printing all these just seems to be a waste.

You mention the opt-out information, which is fair enough. But again, this puts the onus on the recipient. It's not really what I was suggesting.

What I'm asking for is to put the onus on the publishers to actually contact the end users (by email or a single-page mail-out) to get people to sign up to receive the Yellow Pages. That's not opt-out. It's opt-in.

Most email and print newsletters use this kind of procedure and it seems to work well (ie. the people who signed up to get the materials DEFINITELY wanted to get them). Those who don't want them don't get them and the publishers don't have to waste money, resources and energy producing products that go straight into a blue box.

I expect we'll have to agree to disagree on this point. But thanks again for reading. Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ken. Thanks again for correcting my lackluster research earlier. I&#8217;m very happy to hear that the Yellow Pages ARE NOT harming our old growth forests. </p>
<p>Nonetheless, I&#8217;m afraid your latest points just haven&#8217;t convinced me. Is is really impossible to find that recycling information you mentioned online?</p>
<p>Yes, the Yellow Pages and White Pages do have value for those Canadians still without Internet service either at home or at libraries, offices, or wifi cafes (wherever they are). But overall, printing all these just seems to be a waste.</p>
<p>You mention the opt-out information, which is fair enough. But again, this puts the onus on the recipient. It&#8217;s not really what I was suggesting.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;m asking for is to put the onus on the publishers to actually contact the end users (by email or a single-page mail-out) to get people to sign up to receive the Yellow Pages. That&#8217;s not opt-out. It&#8217;s opt-in.</p>
<p>Most email and print newsletters use this kind of procedure and it seems to work well (ie. the people who signed up to get the materials DEFINITELY wanted to get them). Those who don&#8217;t want them don&#8217;t get them and the publishers don&#8217;t have to waste money, resources and energy producing products that go straight into a blue box.</p>
<p>I expect we&#8217;ll have to agree to disagree on this point. But thanks again for reading. Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EcoView: The Yellow Pages Must Be Stopped! by kenc</title>
		<link>http://jnarvey.com/2008/05/11/ecoview-the-yellow-pages-must-be-stopped/#comment-1047</link>
		<dc:creator>kenc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 17:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jnarvey.com/?p=336#comment-1047</guid>
		<description>Thank you for noting our comments on the facts behind the source of paper for YP publishers.

Not sure about where you are, but many publishers do already have opt-out information in their print products.  But to your other question, the publishers through their associations have started an optional opt-out program.  You should expect most of the publishers to participate.  Not sure how they will affect those in Canada.  

It will require people who want to opt-out to confirm on annual basis their wishes just in case people move or situations change.

But what you missed most in your expressions was that because of it's wide distribution, print Yellow Pages are actually the most valuable source to the community regarding recycling information.  With virtually 99% distribution every household and business location should have all of that information at their finger tips, since not every community recycles the same.  In my area, you still need to bring electronics and various household chemicals to different locations.  I was not aware of that until I read the multi-page section in the front part of our print Yellow Pages.  No other traditional media source can play that role and most local governments don't want to take on the expense to push that information out themselves.  So actually, the print Yellow Pages DO provide a more valuable role to the community than you give them credit for....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for noting our comments on the facts behind the source of paper for YP publishers.</p>
<p>Not sure about where you are, but many publishers do already have opt-out information in their print products.  But to your other question, the publishers through their associations have started an optional opt-out program.  You should expect most of the publishers to participate.  Not sure how they will affect those in Canada.  </p>
<p>It will require people who want to opt-out to confirm on annual basis their wishes just in case people move or situations change.</p>
<p>But what you missed most in your expressions was that because of it&#8217;s wide distribution, print Yellow Pages are actually the most valuable source to the community regarding recycling information.  With virtually 99% distribution every household and business location should have all of that information at their finger tips, since not every community recycles the same.  In my area, you still need to bring electronics and various household chemicals to different locations.  I was not aware of that until I read the multi-page section in the front part of our print Yellow Pages.  No other traditional media source can play that role and most local governments don&#8217;t want to take on the expense to push that information out themselves.  So actually, the print Yellow Pages DO provide a more valuable role to the community than you give them credit for&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EcoView: The Yellow Pages Must Be Stopped! by Stephanie Hobbs</title>
		<link>http://jnarvey.com/2008/05/11/ecoview-the-yellow-pages-must-be-stopped/#comment-1046</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Hobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 17:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jnarvey.com/?p=336#comment-1046</guid>
		<description>A couple of facts, last year people in the U.S. referenced the print yellow pages 13.4 billion times and it remains a great way for small businesses to reach their customers.  Our ROI is outstanding compared to most other advertising media.  And our print publishers with online presence are providing content to a number of search engines.  Opt-out information is available in most directories.  Full disclosure, I work for the Yellow Pages Association.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of facts, last year people in the U.S. referenced the print yellow pages 13.4 billion times and it remains a great way for small businesses to reach their customers.  Our ROI is outstanding compared to most other advertising media.  And our print publishers with online presence are providing content to a number of search engines.  Opt-out information is available in most directories.  Full disclosure, I work for the Yellow Pages Association.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EcoView: The Yellow Pages Must Be Stopped! by jnarvey</title>
		<link>http://jnarvey.com/2008/05/11/ecoview-the-yellow-pages-must-be-stopped/#comment-1045</link>
		<dc:creator>jnarvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 16:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jnarvey.com/?p=336#comment-1045</guid>
		<description>Ken, thank you for your helpful comments. I've updated this post to reflect your information.

Jon: "Usually the people complaining don’t have any money to buy anything out of the phone book anyway". I'm not sure what the point is that you're making. Poor people don't have the right to have an opinion? And because I'm complaining about the Yellow Pages, I'm living out of a (recycled?) cardboard box? Is that it? Odd.

But I would remind both of you that regardless of the materials used in making the Yellow Pages, since so many of these books go straight to the recycling boxes (hopefully), an opt-in system would help this company avoid a lot of waste of resources and energy.

I've noticed that neither of you have bothered to respond to this central idea of my post: the Yellow Pages ought to have an opt-in system. What do you think? Good idea? If not, why not? Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken, thank you for your helpful comments. I&#8217;ve updated this post to reflect your information.</p>
<p>Jon: &#8220;Usually the people complaining don’t have any money to buy anything out of the phone book anyway&#8221;. I&#8217;m not sure what the point is that you&#8217;re making. Poor people don&#8217;t have the right to have an opinion? And because I&#8217;m complaining about the Yellow Pages, I&#8217;m living out of a (recycled?) cardboard box? Is that it? Odd.</p>
<p>But I would remind both of you that regardless of the materials used in making the Yellow Pages, since so many of these books go straight to the recycling boxes (hopefully), an opt-in system would help this company avoid a lot of waste of resources and energy.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed that neither of you have bothered to respond to this central idea of my post: the Yellow Pages ought to have an opt-in system. What do you think? Good idea? If not, why not? Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EcoView: The Yellow Pages Must Be Stopped! by jon</title>
		<link>http://jnarvey.com/2008/05/11/ecoview-the-yellow-pages-must-be-stopped/#comment-1044</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jnarvey.com/?p=336#comment-1044</guid>
		<description>Before u take the time to rant about something, you should do some research!  Most phone books are made from pulp, the left over portion of a cut tree.  No trees are cut just to make a phone book.  Also, most ink is soy based making the whole book way more recycelable than the computer you are using. Usually the people complaining don't have any money to buy anything out of the phone book anyway!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before u take the time to rant about something, you should do some research!  Most phone books are made from pulp, the left over portion of a cut tree.  No trees are cut just to make a phone book.  Also, most ink is soy based making the whole book way more recycelable than the computer you are using. Usually the people complaining don&#8217;t have any money to buy anything out of the phone book anyway!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EcoView: The Yellow Pages Must Be Stopped! by kenc</title>
		<link>http://jnarvey.com/2008/05/11/ecoview-the-yellow-pages-must-be-stopped/#comment-1043</link>
		<dc:creator>kenc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jnarvey.com/?p=336#comment-1043</guid>
		<description>Your comments are way off base.  

While the popular myth is that this industry is responsible for the neutering of forests, the reality is the Yellow Pages industry doesn’t knock down any trees for its paper!!! Let me repeat that – they don’t need to cut any trees for their paper supply. Currently, on average, most publishers are using about 40% recycled material (from the newspapers and magazines you are recycling curbside), and the other 60% comes from wood chips and waste products of the lumber industry. If you take a round tree and make square or rectangular lumber from it, you get plenty of chips and other waste. Those by-products make up the other 60% of the raw material needed. Note that these waste products created in lumber milling would normally end up in landfills. Not only that, as wood chips decompose, they emit methane, a greenhouse gas closely associated with global warming. Paper manufacturing thus puts these chips to good use. Many paper providers will also use 5% or less of recycled directories in their paper creation.

If you want some more detail on how paper is made -- actually from a plant in Port Angles near you -- go here:  http://www.yptalk.com/archive.cfm?ID=322&#38;CatID=3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comments are way off base.  </p>
<p>While the popular myth is that this industry is responsible for the neutering of forests, the reality is the Yellow Pages industry doesn’t knock down any trees for its paper!!! Let me repeat that – they don’t need to cut any trees for their paper supply. Currently, on average, most publishers are using about 40% recycled material (from the newspapers and magazines you are recycling curbside), and the other 60% comes from wood chips and waste products of the lumber industry. If you take a round tree and make square or rectangular lumber from it, you get plenty of chips and other waste. Those by-products make up the other 60% of the raw material needed. Note that these waste products created in lumber milling would normally end up in landfills. Not only that, as wood chips decompose, they emit methane, a greenhouse gas closely associated with global warming. Paper manufacturing thus puts these chips to good use. Many paper providers will also use 5% or less of recycled directories in their paper creation.</p>
<p>If you want some more detail on how paper is made &#8212; actually from a plant in Port Angles near you &#8212; go here:  <a href="http://www.yptalk.com/archive.cfm?ID=322&amp;CatID=3" rel="nofollow">http://www.yptalk.com/archive.cfm?ID=322&amp;CatID=3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EcoView: The Yellow Pages Must Be Stopped! by Larry Yatkowsky</title>
		<link>http://jnarvey.com/2008/05/11/ecoview-the-yellow-pages-must-be-stopped/#comment-1041</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Yatkowsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 04:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jnarvey.com/?p=336#comment-1041</guid>
		<description>can't get them to the blue box fast enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can&#8217;t get them to the blue box fast enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WorldView: Happy Birthday to the Middle East&#8217;s Only Western Democracy by Darcey</title>
		<link>http://jnarvey.com/2008/05/08/worldview-happy-birthday-to-the-middle-easts-only-western-democracy/#comment-1028</link>
		<dc:creator>Darcey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 22:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jnarvey.com/?p=335#comment-1028</guid>
		<description>Yeah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WorldView: Happy Birthday to the Middle East&#8217;s Only Western Democracy by Larry Yatkowsky</title>
		<link>http://jnarvey.com/2008/05/08/worldview-happy-birthday-to-the-middle-easts-only-western-democracy/#comment-1026</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Yatkowsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 14:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jnarvey.com/?p=335#comment-1026</guid>
		<description>We could match that, with the super - super -  natural -  tag line.

Now where are those local models?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We could match that, with the super - super -  natural -  tag line.</p>
<p>Now where are those local models?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MyLife: Inspiration from the Trump Institute by Mike  B</title>
		<link>http://jnarvey.com/2008/01/12/mylife-inspiration-from-the-trump-institute/#comment-1020</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike  B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 05:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jnarvey.com/?p=257#comment-1020</guid>
		<description>Interestingly enough the Rick Brown at the free seminar in Burnaby today said he was from Burnaby. But I think he is actually an American of some sort because of the way he said "roof" the Yankee way as in "ruuf" like a dog,lol.
 He did quite the hard sell, for the "program" they were trying to market. Both speakers today were doing the hard sell from what I felt, if they are Trump Institute reps of some sort,then quite frankly I was underwhelmed by what I saw....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly enough the Rick Brown at the free seminar in Burnaby today said he was from Burnaby. But I think he is actually an American of some sort because of the way he said &#8220;roof&#8221; the Yankee way as in &#8220;ruuf&#8221; like a dog,lol.<br />
 He did quite the hard sell, for the &#8220;program&#8221; they were trying to market. Both speakers today were doing the hard sell from what I felt, if they are Trump Institute reps of some sort,then quite frankly I was underwhelmed by what I saw&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
